September 14, 2009

Windows 7 touch: Dead on arrival

Integrating touchscreen technology into the OS sounds revolutionary -- until you try to use it

Touch-based interfaces have captured everyone's imagination, thanks in large part to the iPhone. With Windows 7, Microsoft joins Appls in bringing touch to the desktop, baking touch capabilities into the OS itself. Whereas Apple quietly added touch to Mac OS X Leopard a couple years back, Microsoft has hyped its Microsoft Surface technology for more than a year. Beneath this hype has been the suggestion that, with Windows 7, a touch revolution is brewing.

Or maybe not.

[ See what Windows 7's top 20 features are. And explore the new Windows 7 in InfoWorld's Deep Dive report. | Check out what the new Mac OS X Snow Leopard offers. ]

Two years of avid iPod Touch use has gotten me excited about the idea of touch UIs, so I was eager to try out the vaunted touch technology in Windows 7. My MacBook Pro has touch capabilities in its trackpad, but I usually run the laptop closed when working at my desk, so its touch capabilities haven't been regularly accessible. The new breed of all-in-one PCs with touch-sensitive screens from Dell and Hewlett-Packard promised to change the equation and make touch on the PC as cool and functional as touch on an iPhone.

Well, that was the theory. The truth has been a bitter disappointment. In both Windows 7 and Mac OS X Snow Leopard, the touch experience has been underwhelming.

Limited deployment is partly to blame, as -- despite marketing hype -- neither Apple nor Microsoft is making a serious effort to touchify their OSes. For Microsoft, touch seems to be a technology crush it won't admit it's fallen out of love with; for Apple, touch seems to be a key part of its non-PC strategy. (Neither Apple nor Microsoft would talk to InfoWorld about touch technology.)

Of course, Microsoft and Apple may have reason for not getting serious about touch. After all, outside of the obvious use in self-contained kiosk environments, does touch really make sense on a PC?

My early experience suggests it does not.

Here are the key concerns that make PC touch useless for most people -- and that will continue to plague any notion of a "touch revolution" on the desktop PC for years to come.

Issue 1: Touch is not omnipresent
What makes the touch interface so compelling on the iPhone and on quality copycats such as the Palm Pre is that the use of touch gestures are a fundamental part of the operating system and the applications. Just as using a mouse is fundamental and universal in Windows and Mac OS X, touch gestures are universal in the iPhone, Palm Pre, and so on. This means the user interfaces are designed with touch at the core, and typically work intuitively as you put your finger to the screen.

Close

On Twitter now

Windows

Powered by Twitter

On Twitter now

White Paper

D2D Virtual Tape Library Replication Primer

This whitepaper explains the terminology and concepts behind Data Replication technologies and establishes some sizing rules through worked examples. Learn the new paradigm in disaster tolerance—protect data anywhere.

Download now »

White Paper

An Alternative to Virtualization for Datacenter Cost Savings

Server virtualization is a popular option for dealing with mounting datacenter costs. Another equally promising approach is the use of an Application Delivery Controller. Citrix NetScaler provides a low-cost way for organizations to reduce their server count and accrue cost savings from a reduction in space, cooling, power and personnel.

Download now »

White Paper

Why Your Firewall, VPN, and IEEE 802.11i Aren't Enough to Protect Your Network

The emergence of WLANs has created a new breed of security threats to enterprise networks.

Included in HP ProCurve WLAN solutions is security technology that alleviates threats from WLANs through:
* Monitoring wireless activity inside and out of the enterprise
* Classifying WLAN transmissions into harmful and harmless
* Preventing transmissions that pose a security threat to the enterprise network
* Locating participating devices for physical remediation

Download now »

White Paper

Bringing the Edge to the Data Center

Effectively address data protection challenges, implementing solutions that help store and protect business–critical data while cutting costs and improving efficiency and reliability.

Download now »
Den2010 14-Sep-09 8:46am
1 reply
The biggest objection I have to a touch interface on a desktop PC is what fingers do to a monitor. Specifically, what happens to the face of the monitor--flat panel or CRT--when it's been touched by fingers dozens of times. What a fingerprint magnet! Over time, it becomes a real challenge to see through the thicket of greasy smears that have accumulated. Why would _anyone_ want to put up with that?
immrama 14-Sep-09 3:18pm

I run ELO touch screens in my shop. I have never had a problem with them when the app is written for touch. Fingerprints are a non issue on the newer monitors. I was testing windows 7 with touch screens. I like the keyboard better.

Vern 14-Sep-09 1:03pm
We had first generation "touch" in the 80's, it was called a light pen. They were very light, had a very skinny cable and worked superbly across a whole range of platforms and screens. The killer was fatigue. Hold your arm(s) out in front of you and move them around for an hour. By the end of the hour your arms will be made of lead and you will beg for a good old mouse and keyboard input devices. This isn't like TV and movies. Touch is cool as long as you don't have to use it for any real work on anything other than a portable device.

Sign up to receive InfoWorld Resource Alerts

Subscribe to the Technology: Windows Newsletter

The one-stop resource center for IT professionals.

©1994-2009 Infoworld, Inc.