June 09, 2009

Windows 7: Shaping up quite nicely

As its release nears, most of the pieces are coming together well, closing the ugly Vista era

It's official: Windows 7 is practically done. The code paths are being frozen as we speak, and the final bits should be arriving on Oct. 22, just in time for the holiday shopping season. Of course, savvy users will have Windows 7 well before that date (think mid-July). The myriad torrent sites will see to it that anyone who wants to will be able to run the RTM (release to manufacturing) bits this summer; whether or not they'll be able to activate them in the absence of an RTM product key is another matter.

In almost every sense, Windows 7 is finished. Whatever happens between now and the RTM a few short weeks from now will be entirely cosmetic -- some tweaked branding here, a bug fix or compatibilty shim there. So, given my extensive history with the product, starting with the much-maligned PDC build and running through the latest leaked builds, I thought it time to revisit the OS in light of my nearly seven months of continuous use.

[ See how Windows 7 performs in InfoWorld's benchmarks. | Take a video tour of Window 7. | Download InfoWorld's Windows 7 Quick Guide PDF. ]

Here, in a nutshell, is what I think of Windows 7:

Usability: Much has changed since build 6801. Back at PDC, Microsoft had still not enabled the the full range of Windows 7 UI revisions. For example, the new Task Bar was MIA, as were many of the Windows 7-specific Aero goodies. And although some clever users were able to work around these limitations -- by hacking the build to allow these still unfinished features to be accessed -- the net result was uneven at best.

Fast-forward to today and the new Task Bar now feels like an old friend. Most of the more glaring kinks have been worked out, and -- as of build 7137, anyway -- it is as reliable and predictable as the old Task Bar. Likewise, the myriad Aero features. In fact, when using these latter builds taken from the Windows 7 RTM branch, it's very easy to forget you're running a pre-release OS. Add to this the fact that the new UI represents a leap forward in usability (even the Mac fanatics are giving it some begrudging respect), and it's hard to imagine anyone sticking with Vista once Windows 7 ships.

additional resources
White Paper - How to Improve Delivery of Advanced Web Applications

White Paper

Virtual Workforce: The Key to Expanding The Business While Cutting Costs

Get the independent advice and expertise you need to support a virtual workforce.

Go inside:
The three-step approach to making a virtual workforce a reality.
The four flavors of client virtualization technologies.
The three key initiatives that solve IT challenges.
Download now »
White Paper: Successfully Secure Your Wireless LAN With Wi-Fi firewalls.

White Paper

Addressing Linux Threats Leveraging Fewer Resources

The increase in Linux popularity has increased the frequency and sophistication of malware attacks. Read this 2 page white paper now to learn how you can protect your Linux environment with real-time protection that is certified by all major Linux vendors.

Download now »
White Paper - The 2009 Handbook of Application Delivery

White Paper

The 2009 Handbook of Application Delivery

Ensuring acceptable application delivery will become even more difficult over the next few years. As a result, IT organizations need to ensure that the approach that they take to resolving the current application delivery challenges can scale to support the emerging challenges. This handbook elaborates on the key tasks associated with planning, optimization, management and control and provides decision criteria to help IT organizations choose appropriate solutions.

Download now »
White Paper - Is Your Backup System Outdated?

White Paper

Mid-range Storage Considerations

A common misconception is that mid-range storage requirements are dramatically different than that of a larger enterprise. Mid-range storage users may require less capacity, but they have similar functionality and management requirements. This ESG paper examines mid-range storage needs and reviews a new solution that adjusts size while retaining value, performance and functionality.

Download now »
Phansigar 9-Jun-09 4:25am
1 reply
"Of course, savvy users will have Windows 7 well before that date (think mid-July). The myriad torrent sites ...." Lately users downloading Win7 from torrent sites haven't been so savvy, unless savvy includes downloading trojans and other unpleasantries along with the OS. Or is the malware planted by Microsoft to punish torrent users?
Randall C. Kennedy 9-Jun-09 7:19am
Phansigar, As I noted, only "savvy" users will have Windows 7 early. Morons who are too stupid to check the MD5/SHA1 hashes or checksums will get what they deserve. RCK
DaveLindhout 9-Jun-09 8:19am
Randall, I haven't seen anything in regards to Windows 7 network performance, by you or anyone else. Vista had a new TCP/IP stack that didn't perform well. SP1 fixed a lot of issues, but people still seemed to have issues when connecting to XP or Server 2003. Any experience, thoughts, or comments?

It's late enough in the game that you shouldn't get too much grief for some comparative benchmarks. Then we will be able to see if the OEM's detract from the true Windows 7 experience when they get a hold of it.

masterfoo 9-Jun-09 8:46am
Is it fair to paraphrase by saying "it doesn't suck so bad"? Good that it's becoming reliable but 15% slower than XP is really terrible. Users moving to a new version of a product should be excited and delighted. No one wants this product.
rdhalste 9-Jun-09 12:06pm
They still have a ways to go. I just finished up an AMD 955 Quad core with the cores at the stock speed of 3.2 Gig, a 285 OC Super Pipe video card, and 4 Gig of RAM. Xp Pro and Vista recognize the CPU, but Win 7 U does not. It sees it as a 1.6 Gig unknown and apparently is running it at that as it is as slow as molasses running up hill in January. I dislike the layout/organization of the desktop as I did Vista U. It looks and feels too much like Vista.
snookie 9-Jun-09 3:37pm
1 reply
There are plenty of teenage boys calling Mac users fanatics on the internet. i would not expect it from an adult writing for Infoworld. Its really an odd and unprofessional to say for no reason.
Randall C. Kennedy 9-Jun-09 6:28pm
1 reply
snookie, You're right. I should have called them "Mac nuts" instead... RCK
snookie 6-Jul-09 9:49pm
its too bad that you feel so inferior and insecure about your chosen product that you say such things. It makes you sound childish and petulant. If you have settled for Microsoft you really should come to terms with that so you don't have to embarrass yourself in this way.
WrldBFree 11-Jun-09 8:08am
What exact CPU is it that doesn't support the VT extensions? are you sure you just have not enabled it in your bios?
JTB2468 16-Jun-09 4:00am
I'm glad to see this OS coming together. I still don't see myself changing my desktop from Server 2008, but I would like to run something more than Windows 2000 on my laptops. For whatever reason none of the 3 liked Vista at all, but the Win7RC has been running fine on my 2005 IBM...well it was until a batch of updates that came out a few weeks ago anyway... I still don't see Win7 dethroning Ubuntu as my primary OS, or Server 2008 for my favorite MS OS, but I hope it's a good product, and that graphics card compatibility (what I've had the most trouble getting to work with our Vista x64 CAD stations here) will be better. I just hope that MS doesn't try to charge $500 for a license.

Sign up to receive InfoWorld Resource Alerts

Subscribe to the Today's Headlines: First Look Newsletter

Find out what will be news for the day, with our first-thing-in-the-morning briefing.

©1994-2010 Infoworld, Inc.