July 03, 2009

Deathmatch rematch: BlackBerry versus iPhone 3.0

Does the newest iPhone OS eliminate the few advantages the BlackBerry Bold had in our original deathmatch comparison?

The new iPhone 3.0 OS is now old news, but does its enhancements overcome any advantages that the BlackBerry has over the iPhone? In May, I pitted the BlackBerry Bold in a head-to-head competition against the iPhone 3G, which handily beat RIM's business standard in most areas. After all, the iPhone 3.0 OS enhances the e-mail, calendar, and search functions that many BlackBerry users focus on and that IT loves about the BlackBerry Enterprise Server (BES).

So, here I revisit the original iPhone-versus-BlackBerry deathmatch, updating it based on the iPhone 3.0 OS's changes. That original comparison said it was time to bury the BlackBerry; the iPhone OS 3.0 simply piles more dirt onto the grave. (If you're curious how the new Palm Pre stacks up against the iPhone, check out our new Pre-versus-iPhone deathmatch.)

[ Dive deep into mobile 2.0 technology with InfoWorld's "mobile 2.0" PDF special report. | Check out the slideshow "Rematch: BlackBerry vs. iPhone, side by side." | BlackBerry fans tell us why they still prefer the BlackBerry over the iPhone. ]

I didn't grow up in my corporate life with either an iPhone or a BlackBerry. For me, a phone is something to make calls with, and a PDA handles my contacts and calendar. But a year ago, I replaced my nearly dead Handspring Palm-based PDA with an iPod Touch and quickly grasped the significance of the "modern" PDA -- the importance, from both a personal and a professional point of view, of having the Web, e-mail, and more at my fingertips. To me the iPod Touch, and by extension the iPhone, was about as productive as a PDA could be, yet I saw BlackBerrys everywhere in conferences and business meetings.

What was it about the BlackBerry that I was missing? Would the iPhone really fall short in a business setting?

To find out, I spent a month with an iPhone 3G and a BlackBerry 9000 Bold (the professional model that RIM recommended as the best to compare to an iPhone) to see how well each would fare in my daily grind. (For the answers to that, see my stories on using the BlackBerry Bold and on using the iPhone 3G as laptop replacements.) In doing so, I also had the chance to compare the two devices in depth: mail to mail, phone to phone, browser to browser, and thumb stroke to touch-tap. In short, I evaluated them based on everything from classic PDA functionality and usability to location-based services and availability of third-party apps. (This feature revisits those findings in light of the new iPhone 3.0 OS.)

And how do they stack up? Frankly, I've concluded it's time to bury the BlackBerry. A revolution in its time, thanks to its ability to provide instant, secure e-mail anywhere, the BlackBerry has become the Lotus Notes of the mobile world: It's way past its prime.

I was shocked to discover how bad an e-mail client the BlackBerry is compared to the iPhone. And the BlackBerry is terrible at the rest of what the iPhone excels at: being a phone, a Web browser, an applications platform, and a media presenter. With its Windows 3-like UI, tiny screen, patched-together information structure, and two-handed operation, the BlackBerry is a Pinto in an era of Priuses.

[ Get the scoop on the new iPhone OS 3.0. | The InfoWorld Test Center explores whether you can now manage an iPhone like a BlackBerry. ]

Let me show you point by point why most people -- most companies -- should retire their BlackBerrys and adopt iPhones. And why some of you sadly cannot. Note that both devices are available only on AT&T's network, whose coverage and reliability is mediocre on much of the East and West Coasts, a drawback that really hit home when I lost data coverage in lower Manhattan for several hours as AT&T passed me off to roaming partner T-Mobile and its data-less service.

Close

On Twitter now

Mobile platforms

Powered by Twitter

On Twitter now

White Paper

D2D Virtual Tape Library Replication Primer

This whitepaper explains the terminology and concepts behind Data Replication technologies and establishes some sizing rules through worked examples. Learn the new paradigm in disaster tolerance—protect data anywhere.

Download now »

Trial

Free 30-Day Desktop Virtualization Trial

Download a free 30–day trial and experience how XenDesktop delivers a pristine, on–demand desktop experience to users on whatever device they choose, while cutting IT complexity and costs.

Download now »

White Paper

Why Your Firewall, VPN, and IEEE 802.11i Aren't Enough to Protect Your Network

The emergence of WLANs has created a new breed of security threats to enterprise networks.

Included in HP ProCurve WLAN solutions is security technology that alleviates threats from WLANs through:
* Monitoring wireless activity inside and out of the enterprise
* Classifying WLAN transmissions into harmful and harmless
* Preventing transmissions that pose a security threat to the enterprise network
* Locating participating devices for physical remediation

Download now »
MobileAdmin 3-Jul-09 8:27am
Yawn .. more iPhone drivel Everyone else = consumers .. I don't understand why a enterprise centric website doesn't get that. Security matters #1 to any company of any size, if you fail to grasp that go ask TJX how that breach tasted 6 million dollars later. Having to use and support iPhones as well Blackberry, Windows Mobile it's not even a comparasion - you focus your article of the devices but should focus on the platform behind it as that is that IT cares about. iPhone is great is you have no security concerns, have a small amount of users to manage AND they are all in the same building. If not you quickly see how it fails to compare to the Blackberry solution. Lets not even mention how quickly iPhones are jailbroken which could be used to circumvent your ActiveSync Policy. The whole platform just reeks of not being secure at all. Not to mention the lame encryption method they included that is not enterprise controlled but tied to iTunes? Apple doesn't understand enterprise at all. DEVICE wise - sure iPhone is a sexy device with some great features but I have to disagree the mail client on iPhone is dreadful and managing mail is cumbersome and flat out more time consuming then a Blackberry. I could go through every point you make but at the end of the day - it's personal preference. You like iPhone so great for you.
TBolt 3-Jul-09 9:03am
he upgraded to an iPod Touch PDA, and now he's burying BlackBerry after doing some "research" about the product because he obviously knows nothing outside of Apple. what in the hell is going on with journalism today? it's terrible. pretty much any goon who can type gets his biased garbage published by the likes of Infoworld and PCWorld.
federal 3-Jul-09 12:24pm
The iPhone's achilles heel is that its battery life is too short to reliably get it through a long day, and it's a sealed phone so you cannot carry a spare battery. That makes the iPhone a useless toy for serious business users. It's great for kids, great for people sitting at their desks (where they can recharge the phone, during the day), but otherwise, you'll be stuck with a "brick" instead of a phone at the end of a long day just when you desperately need your phone / PDA. The iPhone's lack of security does make it a lot easier to set up, but for some users lacking security is a problem (but most people don't seem to care about phone and email security).

Sign up to receive InfoWorld Resource Alerts

Subscribe to the Mobilize Newsletter

Receive the latest news, reviews and discussions on everything mobile.

©1994-2009 Infoworld, Inc.